Pornography

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on pornography. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality pornography paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in pornography, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your pornography paper at affordable prices!

In this paper I am going to defend that some but not all pornography is immoral. The pornography that I am going to be dealing with is any that I feel dehumanizes woman as sexual objects.

The main definition that I will be going by is from Judge Frank Easterbrook (Satris, 17). Pornography depicts women "dehumanized as sexual objects, things or commodities; enjoying pain or humiliation or rape; being tied up, cut up, mutilated, bruised, or physically hurt; in postures of sexual submission or servility or display; reduced to body parts, penetrated by objects or animals, or presented in scenarios of degradation, injury, torture; shown as filthy or inferior; bleeding, bruised or hurt in a context which makes these conditions sexual." He also says that pornography is a kind of act that has certain effects depictions of subordination.

This also covers three acts the locutionary act proposition expressed, perlocutionary act what effects our communication and the illocutionary act action preformed in saying words. Pornography is said to shut down or disable these three acts by first, locutionary act it causes fear, intimidation - prevents people from speaking at all, perlocutionary act fails to achieve its intended act, last illocutionary act, you speak but it fails to perform what you said. These are three main reasons why pornography could hurt women.

In comparing this to what Hobbes says, "in our natural state one has their beliefs and values and another has theirs", you satisfy your desires and I will satisfy mine.

Order Custom pornography paper

If we used these beliefs there would not be any moral or immoral beliefs for anything and this state of mine would definitely be unacceptable in today's society. On the other hand Aristotle's belief in the ultimate good would probably work better than any of the others that deal with strictly finding pleasure at any cost. I believe Aristotle's idea would work well because he feels that excellence and success should be intertwined with ones ethics and morals. He says you cannot be successful unless you are ethical, so when people are going for their goals or the ultimate good they will at least use judgment in their life. All other Hedonistical ideas would not work in society today. You can try to avoid pain but it always seems to find you and you will never be able to live a completely Europhoric life. Therefore all the ideas I used besides Aristotle's would not work especially if you apply it to pornography, in which case it would become out of control and Hedonistic behavior at any and all costs would be acceptable.

Law has traditionally considered pornography to be a question of private virtue and public morality, not personal injury and collective abuse. The law on pornography has been the law of moral regulation, not the law of public safety, personal security, or civil equality. When pornography is debated, in and out of court, the issue has been whether government should be in the business of making sure only nice things are said and seen about sex, not whether government should remedy the exploitation of the powerless for the profit and enjoyment of the powerful. Whether or not pornography is harmful to the social fabric has therefore been considered; whether particular individuals or definable groups are hurt by it has not been.

Since, in this traditional view, pornography can only violate an idea of the society one wants to think one lives in, the question of pornography has not required looking into who can violate whom and get away with it. Once pornography is framed as a concept rather than a practice, more thought than act, more in the head than in society, its effects also necessarily appear both weak and unsupported. So both what pornography is and what it does, lie in the eye of the beholder, to be a question of ones point of view and moral clause. And since the accepted solution for differing moral views has been mutual tolerance, one mans harm has been anothers social value. This is shown in the form of greenbacks, since the gross profit in the porn industry in the United States has doubled in the last ten years. One can argue this is due to the invention of the Internet and without enough effective interfaces from the judicial system.

The legal conception of what pornography is has convincingly shaped the social conception of what pornography does. Instead of recognizing the personal injuries and systemic harms of those depicted in the pornography, the law has told society that it is a passive reflection or suggestive by-product of the real world. It therefore becomes, a word or picture replay of, something else, which is not real. So its harms have not been seen as real. They have, in fact, been protected under the disguise of the name commonly given to them called speech.

In conclusion I would like to validate why I believe that pornography degrades society as a whole. I am a firm believer of many of Aristotle's ideas and theories. I believe what he says about having to mix success and excellence with ones ethics and morals are extremely relative to anyone in today's society. With corruption at an all time high in some of the most well known business in America today, I find it hard to believe that CEOs and COOs of all major companies consider their own personal ethics and morals when deciding what is best for their company, and ultimately their bank accounts. And I also wonder this; what sort of morals do the porn kings live by? How do they question what is right and wrong in their profession when theyre ultimate goal is to reach a part of society that many consider to be the lowest of the chain?

Please note that this sample paper on pornography is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on pornography, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on pornography will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen paper at affordable prices!

The Murder of Tutankhamen was written by the writer/philosopher/Egyptologist Bob Brier, Ph.D. The book was published by Berkley Books, New York in 1 for the paperback edition. Though it was previously published in 18. What most impressed me about the book is the volumes and volumes of very reliable sources. If looking at the back of the book for the bibliography, a person finds oneself totally transfixed by the large amounts of sources. Not only were the many sources about Tut himself, but there were many books/magazines/journals/encyclopedias/etc., of his family, Egyptian history and more. I found the book to be very insightful and organized in its way of telling how Egypt was formed, lived and died.

Brier did a good job informing people of Egypt, but I was not too interested in the book as much as the critics acclaimed it to be so fascinating. The only part of the book that really caught my attention would have the be the first chapter or so. I really liked how he pieced together the puzzle of how Tut's last days might have been, or at least how he must have been murdered. It felt like I was almost in a murder/mystery story about to unmask the killer behind the curtain. For example, Brier wrote, "In the depths of this night the door slowly, silently opened, just wide enough for a single man to creep through before closing it behind him. Somehow he had slipped past the sentries. Had they been told to look the other way?" (Brier ). Those two little sentences almost sent shivers down my spine as I read it in the night, awaiting to find out what happened when the stranger arrived to kill Tutankhamen.

Sadly, the fascinating story ended, and the history lesson began. I found myself zoning in and out of interest as I read the rest of the book. There were many interesting parts though such as; when Brier talks about how the pyramids that were constructed for the pharaoh for his resting place were in fact not built by slaves, but by paid labor. Also, another interesting fact was how he was talking about Akhenaten (previously known as Amenhotep III). Brier talks about Akhenaten possibly having Marfan syndrome, and how it had an affect of his rule as king. I could not put the book down for a second when I was reading up on that. It was just so attention-grabbing to read something about a king that grew up in a place where individuality was looked down upon, and being a subject of hundreds of Gods was the key to keeping the people happy. Akhenaten went beyond the norm and started his own thing where he was the only king in recorded history at that time that rejected all the other gods and declared worship for only one single God. I believe that he did it to be different, partly because of the reason that he was so different looking. Also another thing that changed, was the style of art during Akhenaten's rule. People, even less than a hundred years ago, were ostracized about being a little bit different, but to go beyond the tradition of religion and culture, when being a king, that was just amazing. Brier did a wonderful job describing how Akhenaten lived and how he changed history (Brier 1).

The one thing that really irked me when I read the book is how much emphasis Brier put on the family of Tutankhamen rather than Tut himself. I completely understood that a normal reader needed an explanation of ancient Egypt before Brier got to explaining his reasons of why he thought that Tut was murdered and/or how it happened, but it felt like the book could have been summarized into a large pamphlet rather than a book of such a size. I used to be very much so into ancient Egypt, so maybe that has something to do with my boredom when reading some sections, but I would recommend this book to people that know nothing about Egypt but have a thirst for knowledge. Brier did a wonderful job making the book easy as possible so anyone could read it, and also he packed just enough information about Egypt and its people that it wasn't too much like a textbook. But Brier could have done better keeping on track on some occasions, like in the second paragraph of chapter nine, he starts by talking about how the widow of Tut wrote a letter to the Hittites, and without even finishing off why she wrote it he already started talking about how the Hittites kept awesome records of their lives and how there was this excavation about this king. That made my brain pace from subject to subject and made me lose interest very quickly.

Cheap Custom Essays on A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen

In conclusion, The Murder of Tutankhamen by Bob Brier, was a very well organized and instructive book to readers who don't know about Egypt, not so much Tut, and want to find out more. The sources from the book were very dependable and trustworthy, not only because of where they came from, but because Brier is a very prominent and educated Egyptologist, so he knew where to get the right stuff. I sadly, found myself more so bored rather than entertained by this book. I did find some very interesting facts in the book, but those facts were not even about Tutankhamen, they were about someone or something else. All in all, the book was alright, I would only recommend it to people that want to enrich their knowledge of Egypt and find out more about Tutankhamen without feeling like they have to be highly intelligent scholars to read it.

Please note that this sample paper on A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on A Review of Bob Brier's The Murder of Tutankhamen will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Self Identity

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Self Identity. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Self Identity paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Self Identity, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Self Identity paper at affordable prices!

For decades, the self and related processes have been a concern of individuals as well as mental health professionals. One might reasonably assume that there is a widely accepted definition or description of the self. Surprisingly, there is not. Gretchen Weirob, insisted that her identity is a function of nothing more than the identity of her live body. She called her theory the Body Theory. I fully agree with her view of self. My identity has a major impact on my feelings about myself.

Here, are some of the things I have learned about the self

1. The self is reflexive--it can become the object of its own attention. (From various perspectives)

. Most of our understanding of the world (other people, things we read or see) is filtered through our understanding of self.

Order custom research paper on Self Identity

. Although, from late adolescence onward, the self is stable over time, in particular situations different aspects of the self move to the fore, creating the appearance of fluidity.

4. Due to a variety of personal and interpersonal motives, the self on public display often does not match the self of which we are privately aware.

Although these properties of the self are important, and the principles and predictions that follow from them are many, there are some fundamental things we do not know about the human self.

After reading the assigned articles I got a deeper understanding on self. The readings made me realize a couple of things about myself. I never really sat back and tried to look at my life through another person's eyes till now. I see that while I always thought that I had a lot of free will and was allowed to make my own decisions, I really wasn't so free after all. I can remember back when I was in high school, my parents never asked what I was going to be, I remember them telling me that I was going to be an engineer. I know that if you would have asked me at anytime in high school what I wanted to do when I grew up, I would have said, "I want to work at Ford Motor Company like my dad." But instead my mom said, "You're going to be an engineer when you grow up." Granted I am happy doing engineering work, maybe my parents could see the future. Maybe they knew my destiny? I will probably never know. I am not saying that everything in my life is determined. There are always going to be circumstances that will grant a little free will. It was not determined that I was going to steal the bike from the kid next door, but It was determined that if I steal my dad would spank me. My parents never forced me to be a certain religion, they never even made me go to church, that gave me the freedom to wait and decide for my self which religion I would practice. I just don't think that any of us could see that from day one that religion actually would be determined, cause being that I have always looked up to my dad, as both a great father and a best friend, I always wanted to do what he has done, so naturally I would end up choosing his religion.

When I am approached on the topic of race, it automatically rubs me the wrong way. There was a particular part in the front of chapter 8 (Who am I?) that stuck in my head, "Our identity through time is considered to be a function of the continuity of our thoughts, beliefs, and feelings. My parents have built certain beliefs into me, and I have gone 4 years following these beliefs. But I do agree with Charles Mills, when he asks, "what criteria must a person meet to be black or white?" The word nigger seems to be a very offensive word today, but who is it

offensive to? Does that word have to associate with the black race? Can it be also associated with the white race? I say, "yes it can".

B.F. Skinner believes that all human behavior is caused completely by something external. Skinner doesn't rule out the fact that human beings don't make choices; however, he does rule out the possibility that human choices are free.

I asked my fianc to tell me how she sees me in regards to the topics we discussed. Being that Stephanie has known me from an early age I felt that she would have a good perception. As to what defines me. "Whether or not Chris wanted to become an engineer, that choice remains uncertain. An unknown author wrote, "someone's present actions are a part of a casual chain that extends back far before birth, and each link of the chain determines the next link on the chain." I believe that the beginning of Chris chain begins with his mother. As he knows, his mother saw something in him, a future that was immeasurable in field of engineering, and as a person in general. She guided him to make what she believed to be the right choices and continued to reinforce her values on him. Chris is grateful for what his mother has sacrificed and the values she has insoled in him. However, if David could have the

opportunity to be "free", I don't know if he would have made the same choices. Regardless of the external factors that influence Chris life, Chris would still be genuine. He is one that will admit that his life has been determined, and the negative influences in his life are things to learn from. He avoids behavior that he views that could be harmful regardless of what other people think, which allows him to create his own individuality. Some might not see what makes up Chris, and being his fianc, my views of him will be prejudice. He is warm hearted, one that goes that extra mile to show you that you are appreciated.

Regardless of where he grew up, or whether or not his life is considered to be free or determined, he would be the same man that he is today and one that I plan to marry."

Please note that this sample paper on Self Identity is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Self Identity, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Self Identity will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Standarized Test-Should we have them?

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Standarized Test-Should we have them?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Standarized Test-Should we have them? paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Standarized Test-Should we have them?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Standarized Test-Should we have them? paper at affordable prices with cheap custom writing service!

Michele Coulon

7-16-0

Standardized Tests- should we have them?

Standardized tests are exams designed to measure a student's scholastic performance. These tests are a controversial issue, because some people feel the test do not show the students' intelligence. I am one of these people. What the test may cover may not be what the students have learned in class. However, some critics feel "that standardized tests allow administrators, teachers, and parents the opportunity to view solid evidence of the students performance, which in turn could lead to curriculum changes" (Banta, p.1). So, is standardized test really the best way to test?

Custom Essays on Standarized Test-Should we have them?

No, standardized testing is not the best way to test. Unfortunately these tests do not prove how smart a person is. Standardized testing was a good idea, to test the students capabilities and to see how they compare with other districts, but teachers teach using different methods and focus on different issues. What they think is important may not be what other teachers feel is important or what the state thinks is important. So, as a student you learn more about what the teacher deems important, but are evaluated on by what the state thinks is important. Standardized tests are not a reliable way to evaluate someone's intelligence. Intelligence comes in many forms.

Our society has many different ethnic backgrounds and variations in social classes. So, how can one test acknowledge all variables? The people who make the test would have to have in mind everyone's socioculture theory and social learning theory. This is where people learn from their culture and from the social environment in which they grew up. These issues are a big argument among critics, who are opponents for and against standardized testing, because they say, "Standardized […] tests do not account for [the] differences in social and economic backgrounds among test-takers…." Well the simple answer to the question is that no test can accommodate the difference in social classes (Banta, p.). Upper to middle class society usually have someone to help them do their homework at home. The lower class society, unfortunately does not. My mother, who is an independent high school teacher, works with people in this situation. She has found that this is partly due to the parents lack of education. The parents, therefore, are ill-equipped to help their children with homework. They place a lower value on education. This can make a big difference and allow the cycle to continue.

Critics also argue, "… that the exams do not accurately assess the scholastic performance of female students. Females consistently earn higher grades than males in both high school and college, but their average scores on standardized tests are lower…. " (Encarta, p.). Maybe this occurs because females are social people and don't like to sit for long periods of time. I know I am this way. If I had a choice I would prefer to be taught what is on the test, if that is what needs to take place in order to be evaluated correctly. It would not be an accurately assessment if I have not had instruction on the subject they are testing me on.

Another argument against standardized testing is the multiple choice questions. Do they really have the right answer? A student may deliberate about this because some tests have all correct answers, but one that is the better choice. So, how can it be wrong? Which is why, "the arguments against the multiple choice question tests [should] allow an individual to give reasons for an answer they have chosen" (Banta, p.). This is a vital part of the test. People who come from different backgrounds are going to have a different explanation of why they chose that answer. Which brings us back to what the students were taught in class and how it has been assimilated.

Curriculum is said to be affected by the standardized test. Some critics say, "that teachers are going to teach what will be covered on the test and unfortunately the information not covered on the test is not taught" (Banta, p.). I know that if students have to be tested for a long period of time they get tired. In high school I was not taught all the information that would be on the test and our test scores were not up to the standards. This was not just because we were not being taught the test, but also because many students did not care about taking the test due to being told that it did not affect our grade. Therefore, students did not take the test seriously.

David Coulon is a high school student who I interviewed about his thoughts on standardized testing. He told me, "I do not feel the tests truly evaluate someone's intelligence because some people are not good test takers and what they may be tested on will not have anything to do with the career they want to pursue." I agree with his statement. I feel that if the student knows which career they want to pursue they should be able to take classes that only pertain to that area. I also interviewed Karen Coulon who is a high school teacher. She told me, "I feel standardized tests is one way to evaluate, but should not be used as the sole criteria. When I look at students' test scores that is just my starting point. Then I adjust curriculum and readjust until I get the results I am looking for. I never trust standardized tests to determine ability." These two people make good points because they give two different perspectives, a teacher and student. They both feel that test are not the best way to evaluate someone's intelligence.

Standardized test are a good idea to test a students capabilities and to see how students perform compared to each other and other school districts, but they seem to not be testing in a way that is truly reliable. These test have many students who take them non-chalantly because it does not affect them directly. I will be a future educator and hope that we find another way besides multiple choice tests to evaluate our students. The best way to evaluate a person is in a way they feel comfortable and not bored. Their true abilities will not be displayed if they are uncomfortable and bored. This quote says my message best "teachers are being given a schizophrenic message teach one way, but your students will be tested another way"(Bizar, p.). It means that everything teachers are educating their students on is not what the state tests them on. Some of the information is, but not all. Standardized tests is one way to evaluate, but as my mother put it " should not be the sole criteria." We should have other forms of evaluating.

Works Cited

Banta, Tina. Should Testing be Expanded or Restricted? pgs. 1-4

http//ematusov.soe.udel.edu/final.paper.pub/_pwfsfp/00000fc.htm

Bizar, Marilyn, "Standardized Testing is Undermining the Goals of

Reform," pgs. 1-5

http//www.ncrel.org/mands/docs/4-.htm

Coulon, David. Personal interview. June. 00

Coulon, Karen. Personal interview. June. 00

"Standardized Testing," Microsoft Encarta 8 Encyclopedia, C.D. Rom.

1-17 Microsoft Corporation

Please note that this sample paper on Standarized Test-Should we have them? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Standarized Test-Should we have them?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on Standarized Test-Should we have them? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Essay for AP History

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Essay for AP History. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Essay for AP History paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Essay for AP History, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Essay for AP History paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!

Ill try to help you the best that I can, but I recommend going to your local library and just go over some books that contain documents that are around the Civil War era and speeches of some candidates like Douglas. Ill help you with the first since you seem to know about #.

. The South said that they needed slavery to keep their economic growth. The South had always relied on farming and agriculture for its economy. It had no other way of earning money at that other time. The fertile soil down there in places like Mississippi was ideal for agriculture. With agriculture, they needed some workers. Because of that, they came to rely upon slave labor. They didnt have the high quality machinery we have today so a large majority of the work had to be done using manual labor. Well, the farmers didnt like it and the slaves were working quite well. They would pick cotton and other goods because they were scared of getting a beating. Because of that, they worked really hard. With the slaves, the farmers didnt have to worry about their economic growth. They would just treat the slaves harsher in order to get a better harvest. Without a mass of slaves to do the work, farmers would have to work by themselves or risk hiring more people and paying them more money than the cheap labor of slaves. In effect, the slaves were running the economy for the South. Without the slaves to help them work in the fields, they were hopeless because a single family of farmers couldnt compensate for the loss of hoards of slaves. The South had no factories to rely on like the North. The North was a highly industrialized place without the need for any slave workers.

As for a legal approach, Im not exactly sure on this, but I think I might have an idea. In colonial times, this topic was debated too. Thomas Jefferson wanted to add in an anti-slavery clause in the Declaration of Independence. However, he was stopped by John Rutledge and other Southern delegates. They mightve taken that into scope in this situation. Slavery had been allowed since the colonial days. Washington had them and so did Jefferson and many others. They couldve argued that the founding fathers had used slaves themselves and that they were just doing what was in the aspects of the law. The Southerners took a loose representation of the Constitution and other documents like the Declaration of Independence. If something like slavery wasnt outlawed in any legal document, they felt that they had the right to use that task. Since slavery was never outlawed by anyone yet, they were free to do so. Since slavery had never been punished for even in the colonial times when the country was being built, they had felt that they were entitled to engage in the act of slavery.

With a religious aspect, I have nothing in my mind except for the possible idea of the slaves of Egypt under Rameses. Since the slaves had worked quite well with the Egyptians in building everything, they probably thought that the prosperity of Egypt could also be brought to America through the act of slavery.

Write my Essay on Essay for AP History cheap

1. Well, in the 1850s, the Underground Railroad was bustling and very busy at that time. All the slaves were escaping and the Northerners were outraged by the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act. In their mind, they felt no need to release slaves back into the oppression of the South. Besides that, there were more and more states being admitted. Nebraska had been debated over forever. The North kept arguing for a free state of Nebraka while the South felt that Nebraska needed to have slavery legalized. Such arguing broke up Congress and the nation. Everytime a state was called into statehood, people would gripe about it being a free or slave state. They would move into the states in order to sway the public vote into being a slave or a free state. There was constant turmoil. Out of the political scope, there was a piece of literature that would enrage the South. Uncle Toms Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe had debuted to the outer world. She had expressed her deep feelings about the evils of slavery. She had never visited the South before and hadnt known of anything Southern. The Southerners felt that was a book of slander meant to sully the reputation and pride of the South. With Fort Sumter, South Carolina had already seceded from the Union. They wanted to get rid of the Union troops. They felt that since they had left the Union, Fort Sumter (a Union military base) shouldnt have been on their territory. They ordered the evacuation of the fort. They wanted the Union troops out of their property now. Fort Sumter really wasnt a force to be reckoned with. It was undersupplied and really wasnt a huge necessity for the Union. It was just your average fort that wasnt even a threat to South Carolina. During the standoff, Robert Anderson, the leader of Fort Sumter, refused to give up the fort. As a result. the Southerners attacked and won against the weak fort. Anderson had surrendered. This got the Unions blood boiling. Other Southern states who also felt oppressed by the nations government eventually got the confidence to leave the Union. They had seen how the Union army could have been defeated so easily by a single state. With that victory, Southerners got even more rebellious and seceded. All these events escalated to war.

I hope this helps. You may want to go more in depth into the topics that I just brought up.

Please note that this sample paper on Essay for AP History is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Essay for AP History, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Essay for AP History will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching

If you order your cheap term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!

When Americans think of government they tend to think about the confusing and boring side of it. Many also think about the perplexing situations that politicians deal with. If Americans looked at government from the Tao-Te-Ching aspect, they would look at government much differently. The Tao has various meanings, in one way it means "the way", but it can also mean "the way to live." The Tao-Te-Ching, written by Lao-Tzu, was understood to be a handbook for politicians. The Tao-Te-Ching ought to be the handbook for not only politicians but Americans as well. Not only does this piece teach about government but also it teaches self-value. This wisdom that is derived from ancient China confronts its readers with a baffling language and a moral experience that is almost personal. In many ways this text bears a resemblance to poetry, there are numerous concealed meanings that have to be closely read and interpreted.

The Tao-Te-Ching can be seen or meant as "the way to live". Americans live by the government; it gives citizens laws that are to be followed at all times with no exceptions. The Tao states (Verse 57; line 6), "The more prohibitions you have the less virtuous people will be." American society was founded upon rebellion. The early American colonists revolted against the English government. The more laws and restrictions the King placed on them the more they rebelled and fought. When the American people feel oppressed by any law or prohibition set by the government the people will challenge it in an effort to change it. Laws are designed to protect society as a whole from wrongful actions. There are many laws that a United States citizen has to follow, but everyday a law is broken. Whether it is a murder or a store theft, every law in the United States is not abided by. The more that the law is enforced there are criminals around to break them. In 14 the federal "Crime Bill," was signed into law by President Clinton, included was the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. This new law was thought to bring a little more peace amongst Americans everywhere (NRA, 00, para. 1). According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the crime rate has gone up since this law was made in 14. In 14 the number of citizens jailed became a very high number of 486,474, within that year that number increased by more than 0,000. From the time when the "Crime Bill" was signed the number of citizens jailed enlarged by more than 17,000. All of this proves that the more laws that are made, the less moral most Americans become.

The Tao-Te-Ching explains that, "The more weapons you have, the less secure people will be". Weapons exist not for the making of peace, but for the making of violence. Weapons make many Americans feel unsafe and paranoid, weapons kill and destroy, no one wants to walk amongst convicts and killers. Americans will feel that they are in a great amount of danger if the need to be protected with weapons is so significant. America is the land of "The Free", who wants to become a prisoner of their home, because the world is becoming too dangerous to live in? Weapons create all of this turmoil and as Americans no one deserves to feel unsafe. In 00, twenty one percent of incidents of violent crime, a weapon was present. Offenders used a weapon in forty six percent of all robberies, compared with seven percent of all rapes/sexual assaults in 00 (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 00, Weapons, para. 1). If weapons were non-existent then homicides are unheard of. Who feels safe in a nation where one child dies every three days due to the fact that they were shot or killed unintentionally in firearm-related incidents (Fire Arm Safety Devices, 00, para. )?

The more subsides that are given to Americans the less independent they will become. When Citizens are regularly provided with any service the less they will have to do for themselves. Every year more Americans start to depend on welfare and social security benefits. Social security and welfare costs accounted for about twenty percent of total government disbursement in 000/001 against eight-teen percent in 15/6 (Central Statistics, 00, para. 4). The American system of welfare and Social Security support Lao-Tzus statement that, "The more subsides you have, the less self-reliant people will be". These systems have inspired individuals not to seek the earning of their personal income. In fact, for some this money is not spent on the essentials required for living but to feed their addiction to drugs or alcohol. Providing people with subsidies leads to less self-reliance, which for many leads to a life of corruption.

Cheap Custom Essays on Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching

Ruling a country effectively is brought up through a variety of methods. Lao-Tzu, a follower of Taoism, expresses his belief on the most efficient way to govern. Lao-Tzu's statements have strong political value but they are unrealistic in most societies. The Tao-Te-Ching teaches about government and also teaches about self-value. The Tao-Te-Ching can be interpreted in many different ways. The author discusses what he feels the role of a leader should be, the restrictions and the privileges that should be given to the people. There are various views on this piece even among Americans. Although the Tao-Te-Ching contains many controversial issues it is a way to live by, there is no better way to live than in peace and at ease. "For governing a country well there is nothing better than moderation" (Verse 5).

Please note that this sample paper on Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching, we are here to assist you. Your college paper on Thoughts on Tao-TE-Ching will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Great Portrayal of Women

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Great Portrayal of Women. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Great Portrayal of Women paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Great Portrayal of Women, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Great Portrayal of Women paper at affordable prices!

If someone were to look up the word woman in the dictionary they would get some thing similar to this "an adult female human being. (Microsoft Encarta) There are also many other words to describe a woman from today's words like chick and girl to back in the middle ages and medieval times when women were known as maidens or damsels. For many years women have not been viewed as equals to men up until the last century, and yet the role of women in society is still constantly changing. Geoffrey Chaucer gives his readers a slight glimpse into the life of a few women of the medieval society in his collection of stories known as The Canterbury Tales. Chaucer portrays the men and women of this time period quiet accurately. Chaucer gives his readers a glimpse into the lives of a nun, a monk, a friar, a lady known as "the wife of bath" and a group of merchants and their wives. While letting the reader into the lives of these people Chaucer makes quite a bit of a difference in the way he describes different sexes; Chaucer, seemed to lead the reader to believe that women had an evil-like quality, and that they always tempt and take from men. They were depicted as selfish, spiteful and vain. Geoffrey Chaucer wrote the Canterbury Tales in the late 1400s. Chaucer cleverly reveals a particular social condition of England during the time; in this period, the status, role, and attitudes towards women were clearly different from that of today. Women were seen by many to be inferior to men during the middle ages. Women were taught by the church that they should be humble and compliant to their fathers and husbands. However very few of the women during the middle ages could stay quietly at home because most of them had to work for a living. The women would work in the fields beside their husbands and fathers, while at the same time feeding and clothing their family. The wives and daughters of the craftsmen were often employed and operated as tradeswomen on their own. In the towns, women worked in a variety of occupations. Some women were shopkeepers, others were spinners, while some were bakers. Both married and unmarried women were expected to work for a living. Often women would do a combination of several jobs because they were paid less than men. The women also dressed differently depending on their status, their status being whether they were married or not. Young single women often wore their hair loose where as married women were expected to keep their hair covered at all times in a linen as a sign of modesty. Many unmarried women entered convents and nunneries where they would live their lives in a similar way to a monk. Nunneries offered women the opportunity to lead a religious life, obtain an education, and take on responsibilities they would not have been able to in the world out side of the nunnery. As local landowners and employers, many nuns played an important part in the community. In reality landowners whether they were male or female were powerful figures in medieval society. An unmarried woman of property had the equal rights of a man. However when a woman got married she gave up all her land and rights to the man she married. On his death she was entitled to one third of his land upon which to support herself.

Women according to Chaucer, were selfish, spiteful and vain. All women to him possessed these qualities but he choose to bring one out more than the other two in each woman he wrote about. The first woman he wrote of was the prioress, she was a selfish woman who did not honor her vows to her church. Chaucer says it best when he says "Her greatest oath was only "By St. Loy!""(line14). In her using "By St. Loy!" Chaucer is making reference to St. Eligius, patron of goldsmiths and courters. This is just one way the prioress is shown to be selfish, in it her love of gold and herself is shown. Nuns during those times took a vow of poverty and celibacy, in the prioress's love for gold and herself she breaks those vows many times. The first thing we see is that she feeds herself only fine things like meat and white bread and then we see that she wears a trinket with the inscription "love conquers all" which shows that she longs for a love. The prioress to many is very selfish for doing those things. She knew how she would have to live and she still went along with becoming a nun. In her wanting to both be a nun and live a wealthy life of fine things she shows that she is selfish and believes she should always have things her way.

The wife of Bath is a very spiteful women, who desired only a few simple things in life. The wife of Bath is a tough woman with a mind of her own and she is not afraid to speak it. She intimidates men and woman alike due to the strength she possesses. But instead of showing this as a positive characteristic, Chaucer makes her toothless and ugly. However, Chaucer, instead of portraying her low-social class as shameful, showed that she is actually prudent and eloquent. The wife of Bath has also had five different husbands and countless affairs, thus breaking innocent men's hearts. Chaucer tells about her many affairs best when he states "And knew the remedies for love's mischances /An art in which she knew the oldest dances" Chaucer portrayed her as spiteful but in reality she was just a woman trying to make a better life for herself in a society where women were looked down upon.

Order custom research paper on The Great Portrayal of Women

Please note that this sample paper on The Great Portrayal of Women is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Great Portrayal of Women, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on The Great Portrayal of Women will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!